I
believed that the pro-death penalty was more persuasive. In these essays, the
pro-death had more support, and the anti-death had more appeals. In my opinion,
the support was stronger, and therefore the pro-death essay was the better of
the two. Personally, pathos appeals do not have a great effect, and the Kroll
essay was completely pathos. While the logos support in the Menken essay wasn’t
perfect, it appealed greater to me than pathos.
No comments:
Post a Comment